Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[bonnie]

What my post did was show that I had a publicly-available basis for prefixing "Cindi" with the word "Attorney."

What my positive comment did was show that I wasn't trying to be mean and nasty in giving support to my use of that title.

This is the first you or others on this forum knew that HUH?? You were just waiting for the publicaly available basis for prefixing "Cindi" with the word attorney. I believe in all  things practise makes perfect

 

[Artiste]

Grandma,

Tell Cindy that we thank her for the heads up (my, we would have missed that one, right Bob?) and we will not make the same mistake, but in fact we intend to bring a misuse of process claim to "clean up". And, I would suspect that some of the witnesses,  and maybe even co-defendants, would be "counselors". Got plenty of time and we don't have to be out of Iraq by 2011. 2015 is the more logical timeframe for us to be finished, depending how many more we can draw into the fight. After all, if we are conducting an unholy war, might as well bring the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth out so we can convince even the BLIND that there is llight in our facts and the physical evidence supports our claims. Might just prove to be financially rewarding as well!!! But JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL.

Tell Cindy her use of pseudonyms (that NY pseudonym to avoid imaginary service was just delightfully hilarious) and surrogates is preposterous. If she has something to say, stand up like the anti-church WOMAN ( I dare not call her a lawyer)  she is and speak her mind. The constitution guarantee's her the right. And she can publicly conduct her own crusade rather than use CHRISTIAN SURROGATES, an oxymoron at best.

That is the view from the bunker today, Grandma.

=======

Edit Notice regarding restoration of the original post prior to it being edited:

After looking over the Forum Rules of Advent Talk in relation to using names of real persons, as long as the real name used doesn't identify a user's username of Advent Talk, the use of that name is permissible per our present Forum Rules.  In this case, as the name Cindy wasn't associated with any known user of Advent Talk, it doesn't violate any of the Forum Rules of Advent Talk, and has consequently been restored with names and the pseudonym of "NY" which also doesn't connect with any username of Advent Talk.

If anybody has any concern about this, they will need to communicate it to me in writing by email or by PM, as I will no longer be discussing such concerns over the phone for the reason that I need a paper trail of these concerns.  I will only look at this again, if it can be shown that the name in this post would identify a user of Advent Talk.

This decision was reached by overwhelming consensus of the Administration of Advent Talk.

Daryl Fawcett
Administrator
Advent Talk.

No comment.

[bonnie]

]My understanding is that GrandmaNettie and Cindi are friends.

So what??? This makes Gailon's statement/gossip true??. ******* ******** ****** ****** *******  You are stretching to make a unfounded statement more palatable and in the process see what of this little tidbit can stick to the wall. Doesn't matter if there is fact one behind it,Fact it will become to some


===================
Edited by Artiste to remove inappropriate content

[Bob Pickle]

GrandmaNettie,

To help with the present discussion: Does Attorney Cindi Randall help you at all with your posts?

[Maxey]

I’m really not sure what direction this crazy “conversation” is going but it seems like a perfect time to ask a question I’ve had for awhile.  Bob, do you post here under another pseudonym?  If so, how many?  To your knowledge, does your partner mr. Joy post under multiple identities here?

I don’t much care either way but some might be interested.  I will however be most interested in how and if you answer.

[Bob Pickle]

If you don't care either way, why ask?

[bonnie]

I’m really not sure what direction this crazy “conversation” is going but it seems like a perfect time to ask a question I’ve had for awhile.  Bob, do you post here under another pseudonym?  If so, how many?  To your knowledge, does your partner mr. Joy post under multiple identities here?

I don’t much care either way but some might be interested.  I will however be most interested in how and if you answer.

It may appear the answer has been given

[Maxey]

I’m really not sure what direction this crazy “conversation” is going but it seems like a perfect time to ask a question I’ve had for awhile.  Bob, do you post here under another pseudonym?  If so, how many?  To your knowledge, does your partner mr. Joy post under multiple identities here?

I don’t much care either way but some might be interested.  I will however be most interested in how and if you answer.

It may appear the answer has been given

Yes, I believe it has.

[Bob Pickle]

Maxey, did you miss my question?

If you don't care either way, why ask?

[Donna]

I’m really not sure what direction this crazy “conversation” is going but it seems like a perfect time to ask a question I’ve had for awhile.  Bob, do you post here under another pseudonym?  If so, how many?  To your knowledge, does your partner mr. Joy post under multiple identities here?

I don’t much care either way but some might be interested.  I will however be most interested in how and if you answer.

It may appear the answer has been given

Yes, I believe it has.

I totally agree with both of you, Maxey and Bonnie.  With recent developements a lot more may have been shown to us too.

[Maxey]

Maxey, did you miss my question?

If you don't care either way, why ask?

No, Bob I didn't miss your question any more than I missed your answer.  As I said, I could care less how many identities you and mr. Joy post under here.  It did occur to me that there might be other readers here who would be interested in knowing how often you are talking to yourself.  If there are, I think they can adequately read your response.

[anyman]

Maxey,

This is classic Mr. Robert Pickle methodology . . . he doesn't want to answer your question (just as he has refused to answer if he is a Pastor or a Doctor - both titles he has claimed in the past and never with any verification or proof of licensure in either claim) because he doesn't dare . . . His little dance around the mulbery bush is classic attempts at misdirection and distraction . . . it is another example of claiming to be what he is not . . . however, this time around people are seeing through his thin veil and realizing that his non-answer is indeed an answer . . . it must get awful boring carrying on so many conversations with ones self . . .

Maxey, did you miss my question?

If you don't care either way, why ask?

No, Bob I didn't miss your question any more than I missed your answer.  As I said, I could care less how many identities you and mr. Joy post under here.  It did occur to me that there might be other readers here who would be interested in knowing how often you are talking to yourself.  If there are, I think they can adequately read your response.

[Bob Pickle]

anyman,

I would say that your post is defamatory, as well as unchristian.

And I do not carry on conversations with myself.

[Artiste]

anyman,

I would say that your post is defamatory, as well as unchristian.

And I do not carry on conversations with myself.

I have not noticed Bob carrying on conversations with himself.  Perhaps in another 40 years or so?

[Bob Pickle]

His little dance around the mulbery bush is classic attempts at misdirection and distraction . . .

Let's see. This thread is supposed to be about the Smith v. Wal-Mart case, is it not?