And who has defined this as a holy war? And isn't the term an oxymoron?
Not to some people it isn't.
There is nothing Holy about this and there is only a modicum of civility.
Being civil is a little tough, that I can agree with
And for the record. your prejudices are grossly obvious in nearly every statement you make.
At least some of what you say I can see as humourous, altho doubtful if you meant it that way .
Hope you have better vision dealing with the ones you are after than your vision as far as I am concerned. I have little patience, little espect and little liking for what I believe to be true concerning DS.
Unfortunately that is also true concerning a couple of others in this fight.
And by the way, YOU ARE A JOURNALIST...what a shock, huh? You have frequently reported things you have seen and experienced and the First Amendment to the US Constitution Guarantees that right to do so and to express your opinion, even when it is prejudiced and not objective. Ain't it great??? Even if it reeks of arrogance!!!
That is about the weakest, silliest thing that has been said so far. Really stretching there aren't we??
Reporting what has been seen by some, or what some honestly believe to be true is not the problem,nor does that make someone a journalist. But of course you knew that as you were typing that rather silly observation. No one said being pompous,rude,arrogant,overbearing was against the constitution. Just as stating that, is not against the constitution.
edited to correct formatting error