On another website, Chris made the claim that Gentry's findings were "bogus." When challenged to support his claim with some sort of facts or evidence, instead of merely providing a link to someone else's article, he chose to merely provide a link. When challenged again and again to provide some sort of fact or evidence to refute Gentry's findings, he declined in every instance. Instead, he wrote the following:
If this is so important to you, put up a blog with a carefull synthesis of the arguments for and against Gentry's work and I'll joing the disussion.
I'd already done a bit of "careful synthesis" in the blog comments where he posted this, and so the only thing really left was to provide a place for him to provide some sort of reasoned support for his mere assertion that Gentry's findings were "bogus."
However, he informs me that he will not be supporting his assertion here. And he may not be returning to the blog comments thread there.
Like I said, I have discussed these matters with many evolutionists over a period of years, and thus far not one has been able to refute this evidence for creation. It does not appear that Chris is going to be the first.