"DLS publishing being incorporated almost 6 mos after the divorce had nothing to do with hiding things from an ex-wife so that she wouldn't get her fair share. That is another of Bob's unproven theories.
To recap:
Linda and Danny were divorced in June 2004
DLS publishing was incorporated on Nov 30 2004
The "Pacific Press" publishing contract for the "Mending Broken People" book is dated Jan 6 2005.
Toodles..
Don't you just love IAN's recap and especially the legal implications that go with it, or should we say illegal implications that go with it?
Now let's see, we know that back to 1999 Danny and Linda shared a business known as D & L Publishing, except, Linda did not benefit from the proceeds of this business nor did she have access to the account that served as the D&L Publishing proceeds.
There clearly would have been ongoing royalty payments from "book deals" and we know that TCTR was a result of a prior to divorce published book. We also know that Danny filed an affidavit with the court and did not disclose royalties, whether it be from D&L or DLS and we know that Danny had received a substantial royalty payment by the time of the affidavit. Therefore, we know that Danny lied under oath.
Now, lets proceed to the very next suppositon, that the royalties and book deal payments from D & L were clearly moved into a new corporation known as DLS Publishing. Since Linda clearly had a 50% interest in those dollars that became the capitalization for the new business, is it safe to assume that Linda has a 50% stake in the shares of DLS Publishing??? Ah, but yes and Kurt will prove it!!! Believe me, KURT WILL PROVE IT.
Therefore, given that Linda had a 50% interest in the unliquidated assetts of D&L that capitalized DLS Publishing, that would logically lead one to the conclusion that she had an unliquidated interest, and continues to have the same, in 50% of all royalties for DLS Publishing.
Now IAN, want to challenge this supposition? Would that make you on the opposite side of womens equal rights? Or would you like to take a position that women are really persona non grata in Illinois corporate law??? HUM-M-M!!! Pick you poison, IAN.
IN SUMMARY:
DANNY LEE SHELTON DID COMMIT PERJURY AND DANNY LEE SHELTON DID ATTEMPT TO HIDE MARITAL ASSETS FROM HIS WIFE AND SOLICITED OTHER ENTITIES TO SERVE AS CO-CONSPIRATORS IN HIS ILLEGAL ATTEMPTS TO DECEIVE THE COURT AND HIS WIFE AND TO HIDE ASSETS.
Want the names of the co-conspirators and participants?
Gailon Arthur Joy
AUREPORTER