Advent Talk
Issues & Concerns Category => 3ABN => Topic started by: Alex L. Walker on December 28, 2010, 08:36:06 AM
-
Cindy posted this on her forum:
NOT ONE SINGLE CHILD WHILE AT 3ABN, OR AT ANY ADVENTIST SCHOOL CHURCH, GROUNDS, FACILITY OR WHILE ATTENDING FUNCTIONS AND PROGRAMS ECT AT THOSE, AND NOT ONE PARENT OF ANY CHILD WHO HAS EVER BEEN AT 3ABN OR IS A MEMBER OF THE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH (OR ANY OF THE ABOVE), HAS EVER MADE ONE SINGLE ALLEGATION OR ACCUSATION, OR EVEN AN INSINUATION OF WRONG DOING AGAINST TOMMY SHELTON CONCERNING THEIR CHILD, MUCH LESS ACCUSED HIM OF MOLESTATION OR SEXUAL ABUSE.
Sorry Cindy, you are just dead wrong!
-
Cinday must be lurking and reading our postings, to say this.
-
Cindy seems to be shouting. Why? Is she hoping nobody will hear the questions I have posed to them? Avoiding having to document their claims?
What I see at their site is a constant repetition of a word I heard from John Stanton and Danny Shelton already many years ago when I presented some facts I had seen and experienced. At that time they did not dare call me a liar, but attempted to make Linda the source and called her a liar.
This may work for a while with some people. . .
In stead of her SHOUTING she should present the documentations Nic claims he has. And the documentation Pat Williams - or whatever her name is now - claimed a year ago were about to be presented at their forum.
-
Where does Cindy get such untruths?
-
Unless I missed something, i dont' believe Cindy has any docs from Nik. she also asked him to refrain fromposting without support to his claims. Even though she agreed with him and said that they both had proof, but cold or would not post thier support.
Thing is they kept telling me that I had been presented the truth, but failed to see it. The problem with that is that so far, they have asked folks to take only their word for what happened and that there is documentation of their veracity, but 7 years later........come on now people.
Cindy seems to be shouting. Why? Is she hoping nobody will hear the questions I have posed to them? Avoiding having to document their claims?
What I see at their site is a constant repetition of a word I heard from John Stanton and Danny Shelton already many years ago when I presented some facts I had seen and experienced. At that time they did not dare call me a liar, but attempted to make Linda the source and called her a liar.
This may work for a while with some people. . .
In stead of her SHOUTING she should present the documentations Nic claims he has. And the documentation Pat Williams - or whatever her name is now - claimed a year ago were about to be presented at their forum.
-
Unless I missed something, i dont' believe Cindy has any docs from Nik. she also asked him to refrain fromposting without support to his claims. and that there is documentation
When will we see the support? Is it based on false claims?
-
Cindy posted this on her forum:
NOT ONE SINGLE CHILD WHILE AT 3ABN, OR AT ANY ADVENTIST SCHOOL CHURCH, GROUNDS, FACILITY OR WHILE ATTENDING FUNCTIONS AND PROGRAMS ECT AT THOSE, AND NOT ONE PARENT OF ANY CHILD WHO HAS EVER BEEN AT 3ABN OR IS A MEMBER OF THE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH (OR ANY OF THE ABOVE), HAS EVER MADE ONE SINGLE ALLEGATION OR ACCUSATION, OR EVEN AN INSINUATION OF WRONG DOING AGAINST TOMMY SHELTON CONCERNING THEIR CHILD, MUCH LESS ACCUSED HIM OF MOLESTATION OR SEXUAL ABUSE.
Sorry Cindy, you are just dead wrong!
Well, there you have it. Why even bother with criminal charges and civil litigation? If Cindy says it is so, ESPECIALLY IN CAPITAL LETTERS, then it must be.
Why even question the great Mrs. Ford? Alex, drop your charges and your civil case. The great and mighty all-knowing Oz has spoken.
-
Unless I missed something, i dont' believe Cindy has any docs from Nik. she also asked him to refrain fromposting without support to his claims. Even though she agreed with him and said that they both had proof, but cold or would not post thier support.
:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:
Can't stop laughing at that one!! Funny how Cindy thinks she can come on this forum and make all sorts of unfounded accusations against people, but on HER forum they DEMAND proof!!
Can she spell d-o-u-b-l-e s-t-a-n-d-a-r-d-s?? Or maybe h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e??
-
:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:
Cindy posted this on her forum:
NOT ONE SINGLE CHILD WHILE AT 3ABN, OR AT ANY ADVENTIST SCHOOL CHURCH, GROUNDS, FACILITY OR WHILE ATTENDING FUNCTIONS AND PROGRAMS ECT AT THOSE, AND NOT ONE PARENT OF ANY CHILD WHO HAS EVER BEEN AT 3ABN OR IS A MEMBER OF THE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH (OR ANY OF THE ABOVE), HAS EVER MADE ONE SINGLE ALLEGATION OR ACCUSATION, OR EVEN AN INSINUATION OF WRONG DOING AGAINST TOMMY SHELTON CONCERNING THEIR CHILD, MUCH LESS ACCUSED HIM OF MOLESTATION OR SEXUAL ABUSE.
Sorry Cindy, you are just dead wrong!
Well, there you have it. Why even bother with criminal charges and civil litigation? If Cindy says it is so, ESPECIALLY IN CAPITAL LETTERS, then it must be.
Why even question the great Mrs. Ford? Alex, drop your charges and your civil case. The great and mighty all-knowing Oz has spoken.
-
Now, see, why y'all laughin, Snoopy and Murcielago? :ROFL: Ooops! I'm sorry..........They said they had proof, they know it's true. We're supposed to go with that. See, look at this:(Snoopy if this is not allowed, I willunderstand if you delete it.)
Nikolas, While I appreciate the information, this is partially what I was talking about. This may be documented, and this may be fact (personally I know both to be true, but not from you) You may know it is true and doccumented, but the readers have no way of knowing that. They don't know who you are, how you would know, where this is documented, and with whom, or how to verify anything. Anyone can say anything.
I don't know why y'all just don't believe them. cindy said somebody else told her the same information. It must be true!
-
Cindy posted this on her forum:
NOT ONE SINGLE CHILD WHILE AT 3ABN, OR AT ANY ADVENTIST SCHOOL CHURCH, GROUNDS, FACILITY OR WHILE ATTENDING FUNCTIONS AND PROGRAMS ECT AT THOSE, AND NOT ONE PARENT OF ANY CHILD WHO HAS EVER BEEN AT 3ABN OR IS A MEMBER OF THE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH (OR ANY OF THE ABOVE), HAS EVER MADE ONE SINGLE ALLEGATION OR ACCUSATION, OR EVEN AN INSINUATION OF WRONG DOING AGAINST TOMMY SHELTON CONCERNING THEIR CHILD, MUCH LESS ACCUSED HIM OF MOLESTATION OR SEXUAL ABUSE.
Sorry Cindy, you are just dead wrong!
Well, there you have it. Why even bother with criminal charges and civil litigation? If Cindy says it is so, ESPECIALLY IN CAPITAL LETTERS, then it must be.
Why even question the great Mrs. Ford? Alex, drop your charges and your civil case. The great and mighty all-knowing Oz has spoken.
:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: I'm sorry, but I had to laugh at this. That's the point they want me to drop all charges. Not going to happen. Cindy is a know it all, and in reality knows nothing.
-
:dogwag:
-
:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: I'm sorry, but I had to laugh at this. That's the point they want me to drop all charges. Not going to happen. Cindy is a know it all, and in reality knows nothing.
Perhaps she should run for Congress.
-
:ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: I'm sorry, but I had to laugh at this. That's the point they want me to drop all charges. Not going to happen. Cindy is a know it all, and in reality knows nothing.
Perhaps she should run for Congress.
Oh my! What a scary thought! We have enough know it all's in congress. Could you imagine one week with her as your representative? Especially since she likes to play God over on her site. Oh you better show proof, but that rule doesn't apply to me. Yep, she would fit right in.
-
Unless I missed something, i dont' believe Cindy has any docs from Nik. she also asked him to refrain fromposting without support to his claims. Even though she agreed with him and said that they both had proof, but cold or would not post thier support.
Thing is they kept telling me that I had been presented the truth, but failed to see it.
And Danny did the same sort of thing to me or Gailon in an email. Wouldn't be hard to find. "I'm not going to show you the evidence." "You can't see the truth when it's staring you in the face."
That makes Cindy and company Danny clones. Danny scribes. What was the other nickname from BSDA days?
-
What was the other nickname from BSDA days?
Aletheya - or something like that. Supposed to be the Greek word for "truth".
-
Re: "By their fruits you will know them"
Postby Mercy » Sun Dec 19, 2010 6:30 pm UTC
I see not very many post on this site.
It is appalling to see the nazi-like attitude on Bob Pickle's chat forum. I am disturbed by the malignity shown towards human beings, especially by a man who claims to be a Seventh Day Adventist christian minister, called Johann. I read the Bible and he is not a Christian at all by what the Bible says.
The whole Pickle chat forum is loaded with hostile sarcasm towards 3ABN. I am familiar with 3ABN and I like to watch it. Neighbors too like it. They are doing a good work. It is a possibility that the more the devil works to try to hurt 3ABN, the more people notice it and watch it. Good.
Mercy
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:37 pm UTC
Posts like this may explain the disillusion people like Cindy lives in. Explain why they keep on coming with items they claim are so true there is no need for verification.
-
Yes, I remember that one! that was a particularly mean person with lots of vitriol for everyone along with Steffan. Alethia reminded of one of the demonic characters from one of Frank Perretti's books. Always kind of creeped me out.
What was the other nickname from BSDA days?
Aletheya - or something like that. Supposed to be the Greek word for "truth".
-
aletheia? But wasn't that Cindy?
-
Yes, I remember that one! that was a particularly mean person with lots of vitriol for everyone along with Steffan. Alethia reminded of one of the demonic characters from one of Frank Perretti's books. Always kind of creeped me out.
What was the other nickname from BSDA days?
Aletheya - or something like that. Supposed to be the Greek word for "truth".
So, princessdi, was Cindy your good friend, as you have maintained on the "other" site, or the creepy character you mention above?
-
Yes.
aletheia? But wasn't that Cindy?
-
Post removed.
Inappropriate content.
-
You know I am typing as I have already seen Murielago answer "yes" that Cindy having more than one ID(which was prevalent back then.........) on BSDA, and the second being totally opposite from the one she exhibited as Cindy. i can see that as it happened all the time. We even had one ID that was kindof interchangeable, didnt' we?
So, princessdi, was Cindy your good friend, as you have maintained on the "other" site, or the creepy character you mention above?
-
Been a while since I have posted over here. :console: WOW! Cindy Conard.......hmmmm.. When will you learn? Your opinion and nonsense is useless.
Hm. One must wonder who your source of information is? Danny Lee Shelton? Walt Thompson? Brad Walker? Just who?
All of those I mentioned are PROVEN liars.
The fact is a suit is coming! 3ABN, Danny Lee Shelton, Walt Thomson, Brad Walker, or anyone else who is top contenders to be named in the suit can stop it! Oh, it's also a good possibility that Our friend over on he other site with the big mouth, Ms. Cindy Conard Ford is going to be named in a suit too.
Hopefully, Cindy's festering "know it all lawyer skills" will keep her [censored] out of paying out. Who knows?
-
I thought Cindy did not have credentials anymore to help anyone? Wasn't she disbarred? It's been a while and maybe I am wrong on this.
-
Good to hear from you again, Tinka. That was Cindy Randall who was disbarred (sp?) and has unfortunately passed away from cancer I believe. They are joking about Cindy from the other website practicing law as she seems to display unlimited confidence.
-
Thankyou childoftheking, sorry for anyone going through sickness so devestating. Guess I was confused because the Cindy that was on here never mentioned about being an attorney but seemed to be spouting all the legal aspects like an attorney and therefore with names the same I was not sure on who was who. But I do now and it makes sense of the pms that I had prevously. Just couldn't put it all together until your info. Thanks again.
-
OK - more chuckles from the land of Oz... :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: Alex...
by Cynthia » Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:20 pm UTC
...snip...
"Unlike adventtalk, we don't say things are lies, or call people liars here without the evidence and proof to back it up."
...snip...
"The only thing Pickle has ever alluded to or mentioned is Derrell Mundall's (an adult), accusation which was retracted and apologized for by Mundall himself after it was investigated at 3ABN, and which his ex-wife even came to believe was a lie."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Then this from the great Steffan K:
What was Mundall's accusation?
by steffan » Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:40 pm UTC
"What did he say, and when was it retracted? Is there any documentation?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And the response from Miss "We Demand Documentation":
Re: What was Mundall's accusation?
by Cynthia » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:56 pm UTC
"If you are asking, do I have the documentation to post? No, I don't. I would presume it's in the employee records at 3ABN. Pickle and company have referred to the incident many times on the forums always saying things like "there was an allegation by a young man at 3abn" but to the best of my knowledge, never naming who made that accusation-- at least on the forums. Pickle did in a court filing though, saying it was Darrell Mundall. That's how I found out about it all. I could look that part up if needed, but it might take some time to locate it in all the Pacer documents."
...snip...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Things that make you go "hhhmmm....." :dunno: :dunno: :dunno: :dunno: :dunno:
Post edited to remove Steffan's full name per his complaint. (I know, I know - pot, kettle, black...) However, his contact information is publically available at http://whois.domaintools.com/3abntalk.com.
-
Cindy post this: Talking about Bob and Gailon:
All they have imo is the ability to [censored] into other people's business, and demand answers with their chests filled with pride, and their boasts and threats of making those they accuse pay, and their big but empty talk of lawsuits and settlements...
Here is a prime example of as Lynette posted, HYPOCRITE? and DOUBLE STANDARD? Cindy out of all people shouldn't be making hypocritical statements about people not "minding their own business." when her nose is so far up everyone she can't see straight.
-
She also posted this:
Tommy did not have anything to do with Alex’s employment at Three Angels Broadcasting Network, Tommy was not working in the production department at this time. I am the one that requested for Alex to work with me in the music video department for Linda Shelton, Linda approved him to work on her crew but Alex was to remain with me due to the fact that he was a teenager working part time. I will testify to the fact that Alex was never alone and he was in my care at all times while working at Three Angels.
Let me be clear this statement will be proven as false. Many at 3ABN at that time (some who have offered their assistance) will make it clear this is not true. I was NOT left under the supervision of Brad at all times. I believe, that Linda Shelton herself can assure you this statement is totally false.
That's all I have to say about that.
She also said this:
In addition, from my own personal knowledge from talking to those at 3ABN in the past, it is my understanding that the music videos Linda Shelton made of herself were not even made at 3ABN, they were all at other locations, so if that is what Alex's employment consisted of, he would rarely if ever, even been at 3ABN.
I can assure you I was at 3ABN more than I was out on location for these video's. That too can and will be proven.
-
After Nick managed to pass his exams he wanted to make it big as a new lawyer. He rented an office downtown, put up his signs both in the front an in the back. Finally he saw a good-looking man with a large case approaching. As he entered his office Nick wanted to impress his new client by speaking loudly into his phone:
- Yes, I'll take you case. You'll get at least a million dollars.
Placing the receiver on his desk he turned to the man with the large case.
- And what can I do for you?
- I'm from the telephone company. Come to connect your phone.
It is amusing watching people shouting undocumented assertions in places where nobody is listening or reading.
-
After Nick managed to pass his exams he wanted to make it big as a new lawyer. He rented an office downtown, put up his signs both in the front an in the back. Finally he saw a good-looking man with a large case approaching. As he entered his office Nick wanted to impress his new client by speaking loudly into his phone:
- Yes, I'll take you case. You'll get at least a million dollars.
Placing the receiver on his desk he turned to the man with the large case.
- And what can I do for you?
- I'm from the telephone company. Come to connect your phone.
It is amusing watching people shouting undocumented assertions in places where nobody is listening or reading.
:ROFL:
-
After Nick managed to pass his exams he wanted to make it big as a new lawyer. He rented an office downtown, put up his signs both in the front an in the back. Finally he saw a good-looking man with a large case approaching. As he entered his office Nick wanted to impress his new client by speaking loudly into his phone:
- Yes, I'll take you case. You'll get at least a million dollars.
Placing the receiver on his desk he turned to the man with the large case.
- And what can I do for you?
- I'm from the telephone company. Come to connect your phone.
It is amusing watching people shouting undocumented assertions in places where nobody is listening or reading.
:ROFL:
I really NEEDED that laugh! :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL: :thumbsup: :purr:
-
Informative and amusing...one thought on Cindy Conard...she is the best Danny Lee Shelton mouthpeice and should be left to speak HIS mind...she is an excellent intelligence source, or lack of it, depending upon one's perspective.
We considered a subpoena but decided her "sources" were too valuable to shut down. Great inside intelligence and everyone knows Danny Lee Shelton just can't shut up!!! So he must use surrogates and Cindy IS THE BEST!!!
Besides, she is a heretic and seperationist anyway and hardly worth the effort to depose and nothing coming from the mouth could possibly be the truth given the source!!!
But, I am enjoying the belated laugh!!! Keep up the comedy show!!!
Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter
-
Ok so Alex, if Linda(VP of 3BN at the time/) was taping a video "on location" doesn't that still make you working for 3ABN? I'm jes asking....... :dunno:
She also posted this:
Tommy did not have anything to do with Alex’s employment at Three Angels Broadcasting Network, Tommy was not working in the production department at this time. I am the one that requested for Alex to work with me in the music video department for Linda Shelton, Linda approved him to work on her crew but Alex was to remain with me due to the fact that he was a teenager working part time. I will testify to the fact that Alex was never alone and he was in my care at all times while working at Three Angels.
Let me be clear this statement will be proven as false. Many at 3ABN at that time (some who have offered their assistance) will make it clear this is not true. I was NOT left under the supervision of Brad at all times. I believe, that Linda Shelton herself can assure you this statement is totally false.
That's all I have to say about that.
She also said this:
In addition, from my own personal knowledge from talking to those at 3ABN in the past, it is my understanding that the music videos Linda Shelton made of herself were not even made at 3ABN, they were all at other locations, so if that is what Alex's employment consisted of, he would rarely if ever, even been at 3ABN.
I can assure you I was at 3ABN more than I was out on location for these video's. That too can and will be proven.
-
Ok so Alex, if Linda(VP of 3BN at the time/) was taping a video "on location" doesn't that still make you working for 3ABN? I'm jes asking....... :dunno:
She also posted this:
Tommy did not have anything to do with Alex’s employment at Three Angels Broadcasting Network, Tommy was not working in the production department at this time. I am the one that requested for Alex to work with me in the music video department for Linda Shelton, Linda approved him to work on her crew but Alex was to remain with me due to the fact that he was a teenager working part time. I will testify to the fact that Alex was never alone and he was in my care at all times while working at Three Angels.
Let me be clear this statement will be proven as false. Many at 3ABN at that time (some who have offered their assistance) will make it clear this is not true. I was NOT left under the supervision of Brad at all times. I believe, that Linda Shelton herself can assure you this statement is totally false.
That's all I have to say about that.
She also said this:
In addition, from my own personal knowledge from talking to those at 3ABN in the past, it is my understanding that the music videos Linda Shelton made of herself were not even made at 3ABN, they were all at other locations, so if that is what Alex's employment consisted of, he would rarely if ever, even been at 3ABN.
I can assure you I was at 3ABN more than I was out on location for these video's. That too can and will be proven.
That is correct, Di. However if you notice it says that I was under my brother's supervision at all times. That is a complete lie.
-
Re: Alex...
Postby Cynthia » Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:19 pm UTC
Alex Walker started a new topic on adventtalk entitled "Cindy is dead wrong!" and posted the following:
Cindy posted this on her forum:
NOT ONE SINGLE CHILD WHILE AT 3ABN, OR AT ANY ADVENTIST SCHOOL CHURCH, GROUNDS, FACILITY OR WHILE ATTENDING FUNCTIONS AND PROGRAMS ECT AT THOSE, AND NOT ONE PARENT OF ANY CHILD WHO HAS EVER BEEN AT 3ABN OR IS A MEMBER OF THE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH (OR ANY OF THE ABOVE), HAS EVER MADE ONE SINGLE ALLEGATION OR ACCUSATION, OR EVEN AN INSINUATION OF WRONG DOING AGAINST TOMMY SHELTON CONCERNING THEIR CHILD, MUCH LESS ACCUSED HIM OF MOLESTATION OR SEXUAL ABUSE.
Sorry Cindy, you are just dead wrong!
All I can say, is that I have no idea what grounds they would LEGITIMATELY claim to have. To be blunt. In my view, which is based on the information which is publicly available Walker and Turley don't appear to have a snowball in hells chance of succeeding in obtaining a judgment against either DS or 3ABN in favor of themselves. Alex claiming he was molested as a teenager at 3ABN is a johnny come lately story that appears to have been added to the statements he has been making for the past 3 1/2 years when this was NEVER mentioned.
Before saying anything else here, I would like to clarify something. Neither DS or 3abn has said anything to me or anyone else that I know of or to anyone I communicate with. 100% of the talk about a civil suit against 3abn and demand letters, agreements etc has originated with Alex, Adam, Duane, Pickle, Joy, and the 3abn accusers and koolaid drinkers... Alex apparently has a problem with loose lips in addition to his lying problem.
Alex Walker previously posted this about me:
;) Truth of the matter is I will sue her and not think twice about it. That isn't a threat either. That's a promise.
And then more recently Alex posted this:
I am glad that they are posting this stuff because they are breaking an agreement set forth by my retained attorney's at Manly and Stewart and 3ABN's attorney Gregory Simpson. This allows us the opportunity to speak publically (Yes, to the media) of our choice, to refute these statements.
Fact: The posters here who are attempting to defend 3ABN are NOT privy to, part of, or subject to any alleged agreement between Alex Walker and his attorneys or 3ABN and their attorney. Alex "loose lips" Walker would be the only one speaking to others and posting publicly about all, who is privy to, part of, or breaking any alleged agreement -- if such an agreement actually exists... Who else could be feeding the 3abn accusers on adventtalk information and talking to them? It's obvious, right?
Now, this morning Alex's roomate (alter ego?), Adam posts this:
The fact is a suit is coming! 3ABN, Danny Lee Shelton, Walt Thomson, Brad Walker, or anyone else who is top contenders to be named in the suit can stop it! Oh, it's also a good possibility that Our friend over on he other site with the big mouth, Ms. Cindy Conard Ford is going to be named in a suit too.
Hopefully, Cindy's festering "know it all lawyer skills" will keep her [censored] out of paying out. Who knows?
Well they may indeed attempt a civil suit, but Alex Walker and his cohorts are making empty threats against us in what appears to me to be attempts to intimidate and silence us, while falsely accusing us of doing that. That is not unusual, nor a surprise. The accusers of 3ABN have always accused DS, 3ABN, and even us of what they themselves do. The absolute truth is that libel and slander are illegal, but telling the documented truth is not, and is an absolute defense against a charge of defamation per se or libel. Further: Anyone can legally comment on public information and news and give their opinion and views or ask questions about it based on what is made known publicly. That is our right. It is called free speech. So I, for one, will continue to exercise my rights, and encourage others to do the same being mindful of, and careful about both what and how things are said.
~ Cindy
Cindy Ford Conard strkes again. Does she not realize she makes herself look stupid with each post? NOTICE: She states that Alex and the other victim do not have a chance to win against 3ABN and Danny Shelton. I beg to differ. You don't have attorney's like John Manly and Jeff Anderson taking a case of this magnitude if they didn't believe they would be successful.
Oh, and Cindy "busybody" Conard. just shut it.
-
Danny Lee Shelton could commit adultery with a dozen women on the set of 3ABN "LIVE", allow Tommy Ray Shelton to molest a couple more dozen children also on "LIVE" TV, Brad could put his hand on the Bible and swear to Lie Under Oath, the whole lie and nothing but a lie,
AND CINDY CONARD WOULD STILL MAINTAIN THEY WERE NOT GUILTY!!!!
I find it ironic that she is banished to a moonscape site and we still bring her wisdom back here to debate it...why not simply bring her back here and trash her face to face!!! The conflict would raise your ratings and give each of you the exciting opportunity to participate in a rabid and open debate of the issues.
Let the evidence rip and let the excitement build!!!
Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter
-
Yes, bring her back! As Gailon said we could attack her much more efficiently over here!
-
:ROFL: I don't know about that. Sometimes if you mess in d--ly you get it on you or get the disease. Her conversations were so flacked it was a waste of time trying to keep up with the hopping down the :rabbit: trail. Although sometimes the more people talk the more you find out until the :beagle: outsmarts and waits :dogwag: at the finish line. Maybe it is the real reason she does not come here anymore.
This all is so obvious that I often wonder if the 3abn people don't realize she is a hinder to them......or they are the same caliber or the actions brought on with documents and motions would all not be in motion. I still can't believe the letter that was wrote to the judge. I really had to laugh on that one.
-
I find it ironic that she is banished to a moonscape site and we still bring her wisdom back here to debate it...why not simply bring her back here and trash her face to face!!! The conflict would raise your ratings and give each of you the exciting opportunity to participate in a rabid and open debate of the issues.
It might appear to be a simple matter to some, but it is not so simple for the moderators. A forum has rules, and users who insist on breaking those rules on a regular basis increase the need for forum moderation exponentially.
If you want to see a change in the status of her membership here, I suggest you contact forum administration privately with your request and we can discuss it as a group.
-
[Grandma] Tinka!!! For shame!!! LOL!!!
:ROFL: I don't know about that. Sometimes if you mess in d--ly you get it on you or get the disease. Her conversations were so flacked it was a waste of time trying to keep up with the hopping down the :rabbit: trail. Although sometimes the more people talk the more you find out until the :beagle: outsmarts and waits :dogwag: at the finish line. Maybe it is the real reason she does not come here anymore.
This all is so obvious that I often wonder if the 3abn people don't realize she is a hinder to them......or they are the same caliber or the actions brought on with documents and motions would all not be in motion. I still can't believe the letter that was wrote to the judge. I really had to laugh on that one.
-
[Grandma] Tinka!!! For shame!!! LOL!!!
:ROFL: I don't know about that. Sometimes if you mess in d--ly you get it on you or get the disease. Her conversations were so flacked it was a waste of time trying to keep up with the hopping down the :rabbit: trail. Although sometimes the more people talk the more you find out until the :beagle: outsmarts and waits :dogwag: at the finish line. Maybe it is the real reason she does not come here anymore.
This all is so obvious that I often wonder if the 3abn people don't realize she is a hinder to them......or they are the same caliber or the actions brought on with documents and motions would all not be in motion. I still can't believe the letter that was wrote to the judge. I really had to laugh on that one.
Tinka,
You are absolutely right about the letter to the judge. Can anyone say P A T H E T I C? It was seriously pathetic if you ask me.
-
Now Snoopy, Suspend the rules and amend the constitution to declare Cindy as vicar of the anointed one and is therefore exempt.
They do it in congress every time they want to approve a spending bill that adds to the deficit and fill either their own or a constituents pocket so he can contribute to their reelection campaign. We can certainly do it here to accommodate the vicar!!!
Gailon Arthur Joy
AUReporter
-
There up and spoke a brisk little somebody,
Critic and whippersnapper, in a rage
To set things right.
Robert Browning
-
http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g271/Makualla/unknown-1.gif
A smattering of everything and a knowledge of nothing.